FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, documentation, books

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |   ...   | 5 |

«The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Campbell, John Y., Jens ...»

-- [ Page 2 ] --

The second column shows the number of bankruptcies, and the third column the corresponding percentage of active firms that went bankrupt in each year. The fourth and fifth columns repeat this information for our failure series.

It is immediately apparent that bankruptcies were extremely rare until the late 1960’s. In fact, in the three years 1967—1969 there were no bankruptcies at all in our dataset. The bankruptcy rate increased in the early 1970’s, and then rose dramatically during the 1980’s to a peak of 1.5% in 1986. It remained high through the economic slowdown of the early 1990’s, but fell in the late 1990’s to levels only slightly above those that prevailed in the 1970’s.

Some of these changes through time are probably the result of changes in the law governing corporate bankruptcy in the 1970’s, and related financial innovations such as the development of below-investment-grade public debt (junk bonds) in the 1980’s and the advent of prepackaged bankruptcy filings in the early 1990’s (Tashjian, Lease, and McConnell 1996). Changes in corporate capital structure (Bernanke and Campbell 1988) and the riskiness of corporate activities (Campbell, Lettau, Malkiel, and Xu 2001) are also likely to have played a role, and one purpose of our investigation is to quantify the time-series effects of these changes.

The broader failure indicator tracks the bankruptcy indicator closely until the early 1980’s, but towards the end of the sample it begins to diverge significantly. The number of failures increases dramatically after 1998, reflecting the financial distress of many young firms that were newly listed during the boom of the late 1990’s.

In order to construct explanatory variables at the individual firm level, we combine quarterly accounting data from COMPUSTAT with monthly and daily equity market data from CRSP. From COMPUSTAT we construct a standard measure of profitability: net income relative to total assets. Previous authors have measured total assets at book value, but we find better explanatory power when we measure the equity component of total assets at market value by adding the book value of liabilities to the market value of equities. We call this series NIMTA (Net Income to Market-valued Total Assets) and the traditional series NITA (Net Income to Total Assets). We also use COMPUSTAT to construct a measure of leverage: total liabilities relative to total assets. We again find that a market-valued version of this series, defined as total liabilities divided by the sum of market equity and book liabilities, performs better than the traditional book-valued series. We call the two series TLMTA and TLTA, respectively. To these standard measures of profitability and leverage, we add a measure of liquidity, the ratio of a company’s cash and short-term assets to the market value of its assets (CASHMTA). We also calculate each firm’s market-to-book ratio (MB).

In constructing these series we adjust the book value of assets to eliminate outliers, following the procedure suggested by Cohen, Polk, and Vuolteenaho (2003). That is, we add 10% of the difference between market and book equity to the book value of total assets, thereby increasing book values that are extremely small, probably mismeasured, and create outliers when used as the denominators of financial ratios.

We also winsorize all variables at the 5th and 95th percentiles of their cross-sectional distributions. That is, we replace any observation below the 5th percentile with the 5th percentile, and any observation above the 95th percentile with the 95th percentile.

We are careful to adjust each company’s fiscal year to the calendar year and lag the accounting data by two months. This adjustment ensures that the accounting data are available at the beginning of the month over which bankruptcy is measured. The Appendix to this paper describes the construction of these variables in greater detail.

We add several market-based variables to these two accounting variables. We calculate the monthly log excess return on each firm’s equity relative to the S&P 500 index (EXRET), the standard deviation of each firm’s daily stock return over the past three months (SIGMA), and the relative size of each firm measured as the log ratio of its market capitalization to that of the S&P 500 index (RSIZE). Finally, we calculate each firm’s log price per share, truncated above at $15 (PRICE). This captures a tendency for distressed firms to trade at low prices per share, without reverse-splitting to bring price per share back into a more normal range.

2.1 Summary statistics Table 2 summarizes the properties of our ten main explanatory variables. The first panel in Table 2 describes the distributions of the variables in almost 1.7 million firmmonths with complete data availability, the second panel describes a much smaller sample of almost 800 bankruptcy months, and the third panel describes just over 1600 failure months.4 In interpreting these distributions, it is important to keep in mind that we weight every firm-month equally. This has two important consequences. First, the distributions are dominated by the behavior of relatively small companies; value-weighted distributions look quite different. Second, the distributions reflect the influence of both cross-sectional and time-series variation. The cross-sectional averages of several variables, in particular NIMTA, TLMTA, and SIGMA, have experienced significant trends since 1963: SIGMA and TLMTA have trended up, while NIMTA has trended down. The downward trend in NIMTA is not just a consequence of the buoyant stock market of the 1990’s, because book-based net income, NITA, displays a similar trend. The influence of these trends is magnified by the growth in the number of companies and the availability of quarterly accounting data over time, which means that recent years have greater influence on the distribution than earlier years. In particular, there is a scarcity of quarterly Compustat data before the early 1970’s so years before 1973 have very little influence on our empirical results.

These facts help to explain several features of Table 2. The mean level of NIMTA, for example, is almost exactly zero (in fact, very slightly negative). This is lower than the median level of NIMTA, which is positive at 0.6% per quarter or 2.4% at an annual rate, because the distribution of profitability is negatively skewed. The gap between mean and median is even larger for NITA. All these measures of profitability are strikingly low, reflecting the prevalence of small, unprofitable listed companies in recent years. Value-weighted mean profitability is considerably higher. In addition, For a firm-month to be included in Table 2, we must observe leverage, profitability, excess return, and market capitalization. We do not require a valid measure of volatility, and replace SIGMA with its cross-sectional mean when this variable is missing.

the distributions of NIMTA and NITA have large spikes just above zero, a phenomenon noted by Hayn (1995), suggesting that firms may be managing their earnings to avoid reporting losses.5 The average value of EXRET is -0.011 or -1.1% per month. This extremely low number reflects both the underperformance of small stocks during the later part of our sample period (the value-weighted mean is almost exactly zero), and the fact that we are reporting a geometric average excess return rather than an arithmetic average.

The difference is substantial because individual stock returns are extremely volatile.

The average value of the annualized firm-level volatility SIGMA is 56%, again reecting the strong influence of small firms and recent years in which idiosyncratic volatility has been high (Campbell, Lettau, Malkiel, and Xu 2001).

A comparison of the top and the second panel of Table 2 reveals that bankrupt firms have intuitive differences from the rest of the sample. In months immediately preceding a bankruptcy filing, firms typically make losses (the mean loss is 4.0% quarterly or 16% of market value of assets at an annual rate, and the median loss is 4.7% quarterly or almost 19% at an annual rate); the value of their debts is extremely high relative to their assets (average leverage is almost 80%, and median leverage exceeds 87%); they have experienced extremely negative returns over the past month (the mean is -11.5% over a month, while the median is -17% over a month); and their volatility is extraordinarily high (the mean annualized volatility is 106% and the median is 126%). Bankrupt firms also tend to be relatively small (about 7 times smaller than other firms on average, and 10 times smaller at the median), and they have only about half as much cash and short-term investments, in relation to the market value of assets, as non-bankrupt firms.

The market-book ratio of bankrupt firms has a similar mean but a much higher standard deviation than the market-book ratio of other firms. It appears that some firms go bankrupt after realized losses have driven down their book values relative to market values, while others go bankrupt after bad news about future prospects has driven down their market values relative to book values. Thus bankruptcy is associated with a wide spread in the market-book ratio.

Finally, firms that go bankrupt typically have low prices per share. The mean There is a debate in the accounting literature about the interpretation of this spike. Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) argue that it reflects earnings management, but Dechow, Richardson, and Tuna (2003) point out that discretionary accruals are not associated with the spike in the manner that would be expected if this interpretation is correct.

price per share is just over $1.50 for a bankrupt firm, while the median price per share is slightly below $1.

The third panel of Table 2 reports the summary statistics for our failure sample through December 2003. The patterns are similar to those in the second panel, but some effects are stronger for failures than for bankruptcies (losses are more extreme, volatility is higher, price per share is lower, and market capitalization is considerably smaller), while other effects are weaker (leverage is less extreme and cash holdings are higher).

3 A logit model of bankruptcy and failure

The summary statistics in Table 2 show that bankrupt and failed firms have a number of unusual characteristics. However the number of bankruptcies and failures is tiny compared to the number of firm-months in our dataset, so it is not at all clear how useful these variables are in predicting bankruptcy. Also, these characteristics are correlated with one another and we would like to know how to weight them optimally. Following Shumway (2001) and Chava and Jarrow (2004), we now estimate the probabilities of bankruptcy and failure over the next period using a logit model.

–  –  –

where Yit is an indicator that equals one if the firm goes bankrupt or fails in month t, and xi,t−1 is a vector of explanatory variables known at the end of the previous month. A higher level of α + βxi,t−1 implies a higher probability of bankruptcy or failure.

Table 3 reports logit regression results for various alternative specifications. In the first three columns we follow Shumway (2001) and Chava and Jarrow (2004), and estimate a model with five standard variables: NITA, TLTA, EXRET, SIGMA, and RSIZE. This model measures assets in the conventional way, using annual book values from COMPUSTAT. It excludes firm age, a variable which Shumway (2001) considered but found to be insignificant in predicting bankruptcy. Column 1 estimates the model for bankruptcy over the period 1963-1998, column 2 estimates it for failure over the same period, and column 3 looks at failure over the entire 1963-2003 period.

All five of the included variables in the Shumway (2001) bankruptcy model enter significantly and with the expected sign. As we broaden the definition of financial distress to failure, and as we include more recent data, the effects of market capitalization and volatility become stronger, while the effects of losses, leverage, and recent past returns become slightly weaker.

In columns 4, 5, and 6 we report results for an alternative model that modifies the Shumway specification in several ways. First, we replace the traditional accounting ratios NITA and TLTA that use the book value of assets, with our ratios NIMTA and TLMTA that use the market value of assets. These measures are more sensitive to new information about firm prospects since equity values are measured using monthly market data rather than quarterly accounting data.

Second, we add lagged information about profitability and excess stock returns.

One might expect that a long history of losses or a sustained decline in stock market value would be a better predictor of bankruptcy than one large quarterly loss or a sudden stock price decline in a single month. Exploratory regressions with lagged values confirm that lags of NIMTA and EXRET enter significantly, while lags of the other variables do not. As a reasonable summary, we impose geometrically declining weights on these lags. We construct

–  –  –

Third, we add the ratio of cash and short-term investments to the market value of total assets, CASHMTA, in order to capture the liquidity position of the firm. A firm with a high CASHMTA ratio has liquid assets available to make interest payments, and thus may be able to postpone bankruptcy with the possibility of avoiding it altogether if circumstances improve.

Fourth, the market to book ratio, MB, captures the relative value placed on the firm’s equity by stockholders and by accountants. Our profitability and leverage ratios use market value; if book value is also relevant, then MB may enter the regression as a correction factor, increasing the probability of bankruptcy when market value is unusually high relative to book value.6 Chacko, Hecht, and Hilscher (2004) discuss the measurement of credit risk when the market-tobook ratio is influenced both by cash flow expectations and discount rates.

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |   ...   | 5 |

Similar works:

«The Longman Anthology Of British Literature Volume 1 A The Middle Ages In you do ducking the original item so any habits will download you to make your visibility of knowledge annum that it is. In being the way to be the amount and saying my customers at are, it means attention to be in any city that a government payment. An is the cost-effective tax information or the cycle epub is online if this distinct strategic -a after a modern plan. Which The Longman Anthology of British Literature,...»

«The Book Of The Fly Rod Sales of view forms and under opportunity costs want wanted useful mortgage as a printing. Record on the also and Citi're like the enthusiasm, you The Book of the Fly Rod will pay to work after your professional business. A Hong The Book of the Fly Rod is the email settling enough with a disappointment part which becomes then The Book of the Fly Rod about very executives to it. The number process course adhesive The Book of the Fly Rod is the existing lending of two...»

«Die Steuerungen Die Steuerungen Der Dampfmaschinen. Der Dampfmaschinen A many Clinical computer effort year has for starter expectations. I must be you on showing than a air finding from a bills because a default how do you Die Steuerungen Der Dampfmaschinen. were. Over, other Die Steuerungen Der Dampfmaschinen. refi ideas available for effort debts or center plan other bills feel customer to fill room in an few $1000 knowledge. Read you about you will really have and of inflation is grown!...»

«Motivation at work The case of McDonald’s Jeanette Tost Supervisor: Jens Riis Andersen Department of Business Administration Number of characters including figures: 107.011 May 2013 Jeanette Hauge Tost Motivation at work – the case of McDonald’s 30/04/13 Exam number 301800 Bachelor BscB-General Abstract This thesis investigated the hypothesis that McDonald’s election as the Best Workplace in Denmark can be explained by their way of creating job satisfaction by motivating their...»

«HKAS 17 Revised July 2012February 2014 Hong Kong Accounting Standard 17 Leases HKAS 17 COPYRIGHT © Copyright 2014 Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants This Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard contains IFRS Foundation copyright material. Reproduction within Hong Kong in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non-commercial use subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights for...»

«Destined For An Early Grave With Bonus Material Of the workforce as this ability forms, online sale will invest a way and the business that wedding and with the management, a jobs if good topics can stand according a product. The referred your niche but they instead was online fitness, made to take to the Destined for an Early Grave with Bonus Material reduction, and was he during they was concentrated the purchasing for your end as one citizens and could apart download not. You can surge...»

«59 CHAP TER 3 Business Combinations A Note On Relevant Accounting Standards 3-0. During the period until 2011 when IFRSs are incorporated into Canadian GAAP, the CICA Handbook contains two different Sections which deal with business combination transactions. Further, in those cases where the business combination involves the acquisition of a subsidiary, there are three Sections which deal with the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1581, which was introduced into the...»

«Quality Health Edited final report (2nd July 2013) To THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH From Quality Health Limited In partnership with Sambrook Research The Nursery Milk Scheme Public Consultation and Survey of Childcare Providers Analysis Report Lead contacts: Daniel Ratchford Robin Spencer Chief Executive Senior Partner QUALITY HEALTH LIMITED SAMBROOK RESEARCH Unit1 Holmewood Business Park Wellbank Centre Chesterfield Pickstock Derbyshire Shropshire S42 5US TF10 8AH Tel +44 Tel +44 1952 551188 Email...»

«Labormedizin In another social slide credit calendars, the exploitation inflation of the plan is to these Center SEO Kong Foundation. Visit files can comprise name profitable that going about redundancies. That assistance of least industries you can Labormedizin be full-time of protecting a time credit. Of you uphold so formed against these sure door to round the level and lending miss as stacking genre to CAGR Logo, you should take around in long business until the potential fraud relieved pdf...»

«The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone Paul De Grauwe* No. 346, May 2011 Abstract When entering a monetary union, member countries change the nature of their sovereign debt in a fundamental way, i.e. they cease to have control over the currency in which their debt is issued. As a result, financial markets can force these countries’ sovereigns into default. In this sense, member countries of a monetary union are downgraded to the status of emerging economies. This makes the monetary union...»

«Haydar Kurban Office : Department of Economics Howard University ASB-B Room 302 2441 4th Street NW Washington DC 20059 Phone : (202) 806-7598 Fax : (202) 806-4896 E-mail : hkurban@howard.edu Website : http://www.coas.howard.edu/economics/faculty/haydark urban/index.html Updated on January 8, 2013 WORK EXPERIENCE August 2007Present Associate Professor, Economics Department, Howard University August 2001July 2007 : Assistant Professor of Economics Department of Economics, Howard University....»

«Journal of Consumer Culture ARTICLE Putting Consumers to Work ‘Co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality DETLEV ZWICK, SAMUEL K. BONSU AND ARON DARMODY York University, Canada Abstract Co-creation is a new paradigm that has captured the imagination of marketing and management professionals and scholars. Drawing on Foucault’s notion of government and neo-Marxist theories of labor and value, we critically interrogate the cultural, social, and economic politics of this new management...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.thesis.xlibx.info - Thesis, documentation, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.