FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, documentation, books

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 7 | 8 ||

«New York State Bar Examination Essay Questions QUESTION 1 Bob and Ann were married in 2000 in State X. In 2001, the couple moved to New York, and Bob ...»

-- [ Page 9 ] --

there was no way of knowing [the unidentified tipper's] state of mind at the time [the tipper] gave the information, or whether [the tipper] could reliably and accurately relay events." State v. Montel (Fr. Ct. App. 2003). As independent investigation from Officer Simon proved the anonymous tipper's tip false and omissive, Officer Simon had no reasonable suspicion of criminal activity when he stopped McLain, and as a result, both the stop and subsequent search violated McLain's Fourth Amendment rights under the Federal and State Constitution. All evidence and testimony subsequent to Officer Simon's stop and interrogation of McLain must be suppressed, as such testimony and evidence was obtained in violation of McLain's Fourth Amendment rights and is thus excludable under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

II. Count Two of The Criminal Complaint Must be Dismissed as it is a Lesser Included Offense of Count Three.

When the same series of events gives rise to two separate statutory actions, and the elements of a "greater" statutory action necessarily includes the elements of the other "lesser" statutory action, prosecution of both crimes violates the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution. See State v. Decker (Franklin Supreme Court 2005) (citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932)); see also Franklin Criminal Code Section 5(2). A lesser included offense is necessarily included within the greater offense if it is impossible to commit the greater offense without having committed the lesser offense. Id.

Moreover, "Franklin case law does not require a strict textual comparison such that only where all the elements of the compared offenses coincide exactly will one offense be deemed a lesser-included offense of the greater... if, in comparing the elements of the offenses in the abstract, the offenses are so similar that the commission of one offense will necessarily result in the commission of the other, then the offenses are multiplicitous." State v. Decker (Franklin Supreme Court 2005).

Here, Defendant McLain has been charged with both (1) the manufacture of methamphetamine and (2) possession of equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.

The criminal code prohibiting manufacture of methamphetamine is codified in Franklin Criminal Code Section 51. Section 51 states in part that "[i]t is unlawful for any person to knowingly manufacture methamphetamine. 'Manufacture' means to produce, compound, convert, or process methamphetamine, including to package or repackage the substance, either directly or indirectly by extraction of substances of natural origin or by means of chemical synthesis." Franklin Criminal Code Section 51.

The criminal code prohibiting possession of equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine is codified in Franklin Criminal Code Section 43.

Section 43 states in part that "[n]o person shall knowingly possess equipment or chemicals, or both, for the purposes of manufacturing a controlled substance, to wit, methamphetamine...." Franklin Criminal Code Section 43.

Thus, under the Franklin Criminal Code, to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine, one must take raw elements or chemicals and through scientific process or chemical synthesis create methamphetamine. Further, under the Franklin Criminal Code, the possession of the raw elements of chemicals or the scientific equipment necessary to synthesize methamphetamine is considered criminal possession of equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.

As a matter of law and logic, the crime of unlawfully possessing equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine is the lesser included offense of the crime of manufacturing methamphetamine. Under the statutory definition of "manufacture[,]" one must have the raw elements necessary to manufacture methamphetamine in order to actually manufacture methamphetamine. The possession of these raw elements is a necessary element in the crime of the unlawful production of methamphetamine.

As one cannot make an omelet without eggs, one cannot manufacture methamphetamine without the raw materials necessary to do so. As Officer Simon testified, the items McLain purchased or possessed (coffee filters, Sudafed cold medicine and matches) were all simply the raw elements that could allegedly be used for the manufacture of methamphetamine. Therefore, one must violate the statute prohibiting possession of the raw materials to manufacture in order to subsequently run afoul of the statute prohibiting manufacture.

Much as the elements of first-degree burglary necessarily include the elements of assault, the elements of manufacturing methamphetamine necessarily include the elements of unlawfully possessing equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. See State v. Decker (Franklin Supreme Court 2005) (holding that since first-degree burglary requires intent to cause bodily injury and the causation of serious injury, and since assault required the same two elements, assault is a lesser included offense of first degree burglary). Just as the crime of first-degree burglary necessarily requires the commission of assault, the crime of manufacturing methamphetamine requires the commission of the crime of unlawfully possessing equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.

The fact that the literal language of the statutes does not overlap is irrelevant, as under Decker a literal linguistic overlap is unnecessary for one crime to be the lesser included offense of another.

Moreover, the situation at hand differs from that in State v. Jackson (Fr. Ct. App.

1992), wherein possession of drug paraphernalia was found to be a separate and distinct offense from possession of drugs. One can possess drugs without possessing paraphernalia, yet here, one cannot manufacture methamphetamine without with raw materials to do so.

Count Two of the Criminal Complaint (for unlawfully possessing equipment or supplies with intent to manufacture methamphetamine) must be dismissed as it is a lesser included offence of Count Three (for unlawfully manufacturing methamphetamine), and thus prosecution of McLain for both crimes would violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution and constitute reversible error. See State v. Decker (Franklin Supreme Court 2005).

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 7 | 8 ||

Similar works:

«Arbitrage in the Foreign Exchange Market: Turning on the Microscope∗ Q. Farooq Akrama† Dagfinn Rimea and Lucio Sarnob, a: Norges Bank b: University of Warwick, CEPR and AXA Investment Managers This revision: February 2007 Abstract This paper provides real-time evidence on the frequency, size and duration of arbitrage opportunities and deviations from the law of one price (LOP) in the foreign exchange market. We investigate deviations from the covered interest rate parity (CIP) condition...»

«División Estudios Legislativos Cámara de Senadores República Oriental del Uruguay CODIGO DE COMERCIO (Actualizado marzo 2014) LIBRO PRIMERO DE LAS PERSONAS DEL COMERCIO TÍTULO I DE LOS COMERCIANTES CAPÍTULO I DE LOS COMERCIANTES EN GENERAL Y DE LOS ACTOS DE COMERCIO Artículo 1. La ley reputa comerciantes a todos los individuos que, teniendo capacidad legal para contratar, se han inscripto en la matrícula de comerciantes y ejercen de cuenta propia actos de comercio, haciendo de ello su...»

«Software Testing Tutorial SOFTWARE TESTING TUTORIAL Simply Easy Learning by tutorialspoint.com tutorialspoint.com i COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER NOTICE  All the content and graphics on this tutorial are the property of tutorialspoint.com. Any content from tutorialspoint.com or this tutorial may not be redistributed or reproduced in any way, shape, or form without the written permission of tutorialspoint.com. Failure to do so is a violation of copyright laws. This tutorial may contain inaccuracies...»

«Corporate Board Practices CORPORATE BOARD PRACTICES Alexander N. Kostyuk Meiyo Ryoushin Kouki Honor Conscience Nobility Честь Совесть Доброе имя VIRTUS INTERPRESS Corporate Board Practices Virtus Interpress Kirova Str. 146/1, 20 Sumy, 40021, Ukraine www.virtusinterpress.org Published in Ukraine by Virtus Interpress © Alexander N. Kostyuk, 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by...»

«RECRUITMENT PROFILE Profile: Protection The “protection” profile refers to a wide range of functions that UNHCR undertakes globally. Each function may require particular knowledge and skills demonstrated through your educational background or prior work experience. Chief among the protection functions are: a. Legal b. General Protection c. Field (Protection) d. Refugee Status Determination e. Durable Solutions f. Repatriation g. Resettlement Each of the functions mentioned above may require...»

«United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 11, 2008 Decided July 31, 2009 No. 07-5264 THEODORE R. LUCAS, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. ARNE DUNCAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, HIS AGENTS AND SUCCESSORS, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 01cv02393) John F. Karl, Jr. argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Richard R. Renner was on the brief for amicus curiae...»

«JOHN WEBSTER AND TAUA MURU: THE SPACE BETWEEN CULTURES IN 1840S HOKIANGA ————————————————————————— Jennifer Ashton O n 24 May 1847, as he was drifting off to sleep, a British settler and trader named John Webster was woken in his home near Kohukohu—a small settlement located on New Zealand’s Hokianga river—by the sound of a war party arriving on his front lawn.1 As he got out of bed and looked out from his verandah, he was confronted by...»

«Law Firms Sponsoring Public Interest Summers and Summer Fellowships Split Summer, Externship, and Summer Fellowship Opportunities for Current Law Students and Recent Graduates Pro Bono Service Program Harvard Law School Austin 102 1515 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-2216 Fax: (617) 496-2636 probono@law.harvard.edu By Laura Noel, August 2005 Updated by Alexa Shabecoff and Keith Downey, April 2007 Law Firms Sponsoring Split Public Interest Summers What Are Firm Sponsored Paid...»

«Tyler Kendall, Duke University, tsk3@duke.edu NCSLAAP Working Papers, http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/papers.php 2007 (March 5th) Automatic Transcript Summarization and Keyword Generation for the North Carolina Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project* 1. Introduction Automatic text summarization is an area of natural language processing (NLP) research with great potential for a wide array of applications. As Mani (2001) discusses, summarization is an integral process throughout everyday human...»

«South Carolina Property Tax 2010 Edition Governor Mark C. Sanford Ray N. Stevens, Director Disclaimer This publication does not constitute tax, legal or other advice. The opinions expressed in any section of this publication are the individual opinions of the author of that section and should not be attributed to the South Carolina Department of Revenue. This publication is written in general terms and may not contain all of the specific requirements or provisions of cited authority and the...»


«A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife Victor James Zammit Acknowledgements: My special thanks to my sister, Carmen, for her portrait of William and to Dmitri Svetlov for his very kind assistance in editing and formatting this edition. My other special thanks goes to the many afterlife researchers, empiricists and scientists, gifted mediums and the many others – too many to mention – who gave me, inspiration, support, suggestions and feedback about the book. Contents 1. Opening...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.thesis.xlibx.info - Thesis, documentation, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.