«PacifiCare’s medical management guidelines represent the recommendation of the PacifiCare Medical Management Guideline (MMG) committee. They are ...»
Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: A retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol. 2007 Mar 23;
Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, et al.. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):208-14.
Heusinger, K, Lohberg, C, Lux, MP, Papadopoulos, T, Imhoff, K, Schulz-Wendtland, R, Beckmann, MW, and Fasching, PA. Assessment of breast cancer tumor size depends on method, histopathology and tumor size itself. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94(1):17-23.
Holmich LR, Vejborg I, Conrad C, Sletting S, McLaughlin JK. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explanation. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Feb;53(2):213-25.
Hou MF, Chuang HY, Ou-Yang F, Wang CY, Huang CL, Fan HM, Chuang CH, Wang JY, Hsieh JS, Liu GC, Huang TJ. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002 Apr;28(4):415Howarth, D, Slater, S, Lau, P, et al. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery. Australas Radiol. 2005;49(4):289-297.
Hussain R, Buscombe JR. A meta-analysis of scintimammography: an evidence-based approach to its clinical utility. Nucl Med Commun. 2006 Jul;27(7):589-94.
Irwig L, Houssami N, van Vliet C. New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 1;90(11):2118-22.
Jiang Y, Miglioretti DL, Metz CE, Schmidt RA. Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements. Radiology. 2007;243(2):360-367.
Kawashima H, Tawara M, Suzuki M et al. Effectiveness of dynamic MRI for diagnosing pericicatricial minimal residual breast cancer following excisional biopsy. Eur J Radiol 2001;40:2-9.
Kelcz F, Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D, Degani H. Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1485-92.
Breast Imaging- Commercial Medical Management Guideline Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clin Radiol 1995;50:440-54.
Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):444-9.
Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):71-80.
Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Feb;29(1):32-7.
Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1483-91.
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75.
Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004;351:427-437.
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Wardelmann E, Fimmers R, Kuhn W, Schild HH. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8469-76.
Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005;365:1769-1778.
Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Feb;182(2):473-80.
Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):773-8.
Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al.; International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group.
Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance Breast Imaging- Commercial Medical Management Guideline imaging. Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1898-905.
Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D, Bluemke DA, et al. Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;92(1):9-15; discussion 15-6.
Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, et al; ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med.
2007 Mar 29;356(13):1295-303.
Liberman M, Sampalis F, Mulder DS, Sampalis JS. Breast cancer diagnosis by scintimammography:
a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003b Jul;80(1):115-26.
Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, Kaplan JB, Abramson AF, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003a Feb;180(2):333-41.
Lorenzen J, Sinkus R, Lorenzen M, et al. MR elastography of the breast: preliminary clinical results [in German; English abstract]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr.
McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, et al. MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results.
AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(6):1411-1417.
Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM. Breast MRI lesion classification:
improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):89-95.
Morris EA, Schwartz H, Drotman MB et al. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience. Radiology 2000;214:67-72.
Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection-prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):375-83.
Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, Parkin G, Lane S, Horgan K. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Breast Imaging- Commercial Medical Management Guideline Surg. 2002 Oct;89(10):1296-301.
Nakahara H, Namba K, Watanabe R, et al. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer. 2003;10(4):320-9.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) [Web site]. Modalities of breast cancer diagnosis and screening.
Updated January 2008. Available at:
Accessed February 2008.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Web site Clinical Practice Guidelines in
Oncology, Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines.v.2 2008. Available at:
http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf. Accessed February 2008.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Web site Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines.v.1 2007. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast-screening.pdf. Accessed February 2008.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. [Web site]. Familial Breast Cancer. 2006.
Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG41. Accessed February 2008.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) [Web site]. CRISP (Computer Retrieval of Information on
Scientific Projects). Magnetic resonance elastography for breast cancer. Available at:
http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen. (Grant numbers 5R01CA091959-05 and 5R01EB001981-09). Accessed February 2008.
Norman RP, Evans DG, Easton DF, Young KC. The cost-utility of magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers aged 30-49. Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Jun;8(2):137-44.
O'Connor, MK, Phillips, SW, Hruska, CB, Rhodes, DJ, and Collins, DA. Molecular breast imaging:
advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors.
Breast J. 2007;13(1):3-11.
Ohlinger R, Heyer H, Thomas A, Paepke S, Warm H, Klug U, Frese H, Schulz K, Schimming A, Schwesinger G, Kohler G, Wodny M, Kohlmann T, Grunwald S. Non-palpable breast lesions in asymptomatic women: diagnostic value of initial ultrasonography and comparison with mammography. Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5B):3943-55.
Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD et al. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy.
Breast Imaging- Commercial Medical Management Guideline Pediconi F, Catalano C, Venditti F, Ercolani M, Carotenuto L, et al. Color-coded automated signal intensity curves for detection and characterization of breast lesions: preliminary evaluation of a new software package for integrated magnetic resonance-based breast imaging. Invest Radiol. 2005 Jul;40(7):448-57.
Pediconi, F, Catalano, C, Padula, S, Roselli, A, Moriconi, E, Dominelli, V, Pronio, AM, Kirchin, MA, and Passariello, R. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007a.
Pediconi, F, Catalano, C, Padula, S, Roselli, A, Moriconi, E, Dominelli, V, Pronio, AM, Kirchin, MA, and Passariello, R. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007b.
Pinero, A, Galindo, PJ, Illana, J, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of sestamibi gammagraphy and Doppler sonography in the preoperative assessment of breast lesions. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8(2):103-107.
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 16.
Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, Hanna LA, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Jong RA, Rebner M, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis CA; DMIST Investigators Group. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83.
Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84.
Podo F, Sardanelli F, Canese R, et al. The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21(3 suppl):115-124.
Port ER, Park A, Borgen PI, Morris E, Montgomery LL. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1051-7.
Epub 2007 Jan 7.
Preda, L, Villa, G, Rizzo, S, Bazzi, L, Origgi, D, Cassano, E, and Bellomi, M. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8(5):R53.
Quan ML, Sclafani L, Heerdt AS, Fey JV, Morris EA, Borgen PI. Magnetic resonance imaging Breast Imaging- Commercial Medical Management Guideline detects unsuspected disease in patients with invasive lobular cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Nov;10(9):1048-53.
Ralleigh G, Given-Wilson R. Breast cancer risk and possible screening strategies for young women following supradiaphragmatic irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Clin Radiol. 2004 Aug;59(8):647Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM et al. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR 1996;167(6):1415-9.
Sang KY, Woo KM, Cho N, et al. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology.
Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology.
2007 Mar;242(3):698-715. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89.
Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J, Fink M. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Feb;23(2):159-65.
Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84.
Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with softcopy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):197-204.
Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd, Foster RS Jr, Hendrick E, Eyre HJ, Sener S; American Cancer Society High-Risk Work Group; American Cancer Society Screening Older Women Work Group; American Cancer Society Mammography Work Group;
American Cancer Society Physical Examination Work Group; American Cancer Society New Technologies Work Group; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.