WWW.THESIS.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, documentation, books
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 6 | 7 || 9 | 10 |

«A dissertation submitted to the Department Of Computer Science, Faculty of Science at the University Of Cape Town in partial fulfilment of the ...»

-- [ Page 8 ] --

5.2.1 Participants Twenty four adult members of the Deaf community (twelve women, twelve men) ranging in age from 20 to 64 (mean = 37) participated in this study. All the participants were native signers and have used SASL as their principle mode of communications for most of their lives, with years of SASL experience ranging from 10 to 60 years (mean = 32). Six of the participants were staff members of DCCT, with the remaining eighteen participants being visitors to The Bastion. Five of the participants participated in one or both of the pilot studies. Of the twenty four, sixteen had English as their language of literacy, two Afrikaans, one Xhosa, three English and Afrikaans and two participants used both English and Xhosa as their reading and writing language. A further five participants completed the experiment, but they were removed from the study because of too many unanswered or wrongly answered questions.

All participants were introduced to the experiment and each signed a consent form to confirm that they fully understand the project, agree to participate and understand that all information provided would be kept confidential.

5.2.2 Experimental Setup The final intelligibility experiment was conducted across two separate days at The Bastion in Newlands, Cape Town. Because of the number of participants involved in the final experiment, they were handled in groups of between four and eight participants at a time, depending on availability.

Each participant was seated at a desk with a pen and a copy of the questionnaire.

All communications between the researcher and participants were interpreted by a certified SASL interpreter. Although the questionnaires were explained in SASL and all queries were answered through the SASL interpreter, the questionnaires were provided in written English and answered in written English.

The participants were introduced to the experiment with the help of the SASL interpreter. It was made clear during the introduction that the focus of the experiment was on evaluating the quality of the video clips and the intelligibility of the SASL in the video clips at different quality settings, and not to evaluate the participants’ proficiency in SASL.

Seeing that written/spoken language is not the participants’ first language, and the questionnaire required the participants to write down what they understood the Sign Language video clip contained, all participants were asked if they are comfortable writing their answers out. They were given the option of giving their responses to the questionnaire through the interpreter.

The questionnaire and how to answer the questions were explained to the group of participants after which they were given the opportunity to read through the questionnaire at their own pace, asking for clarification on any of the questions. With only one video clip to be viewed by each participant and no clear advantage provided by the practice video clip and questionnaire in the second experiment, no practice questionnaire was used.

When all participants in the group were ready, the researcher moved from one participant to the next showing one of the four video clips to each participant using the Vodafone 858 Smart cell phone. Each participant could watch their video clip once, after which they were given the go ahead to complete the questionnaire on the clip they were shown.

The same clip was never shown to two adjacent participants to make sure that no two participants could influence each other’s answers.

5.2.3 Cell phones The Nokia N96 cell phones that were used in the two initial experiments were no longer available by the time the third experiment was conducted. In the final experiment the Nokia N96 was replaced with the Vodafone 858 Smart cell phone, as shown in Figure 5-1 [42]. The Vodafone 858 Smart has a screen size of 2.8” (71 mm) diagonally and a resolution of 240 x 320 pixels, similar to the Nokia N96 in both physical screen size as well as resolution, but where the Nokia is capable of displaying up to 16 million colours, the Vodafone 858 can only display 256K colours. Because of the similar physical screen sizes as well as similar resolutions between the two phones the Vodafone 858 was deemed an equivalent replacement for the Nokia N96 in the third experiment. The Vodafone 858 Smart cell phone runs Android OS, v2.2.1 (Froyo) on a 528 MHz ARM 11 processor with dynamic underclocking and an Adreno 200 GPU. It is equipped with 256 MB RAM, of which 180 MB is accessible to applications [41].

5.2.4 Video clips Four video clips were used, each showing the same sign language user in the same environment, with consistent lighting, background and distance from camera, signing in SASL.

To simplify the experiment and limit the study to four groups it was decided to focus on only two frame rates, namely 20 and 10 frames per second.

Figure 5-1: A Vodafone 858 Smart.

The cell phone model used in the final experiment.

Four clips were acquired from a DVD, as MPEG-4 files at full resolution and frame rate, and at best possible quality. Each of the clips were then recompressed to the required resolution and frame rate, using the Export (Using QuickTime conversion) feature of Final Cut Express (v4.0.1).

As was done in the follow-up pilot study (Experiment 2) the source video clips were resized to the desired resolutions by cropping the frames. This made sure no space on the cell phone screen was wasted with black bands or unused background area, making much better use of the available screen resolution. And giving an accurate simulation of the screen real estate usage as would be the case when the phone was used for video communication.





A data rate of 5000 kbits/sec was used to minimise the impact of the video compression on the quality of the resulting video clip.

One clip was created for each of the four possible combinations of resolution and frame rate.

The basic details of these four video clips are shown in Table 5-1. The full details of the video clips, including the data rate, file size and duration of each of the video clips are available in Table C-2, in Appendix C.

–  –  –

5.2.5 Questionnaire Each set of questionnaires, as shown in Appendix C, contained a cover page explaining the purpose of the experiment and provided a summary of the experimental procedure, as well as consent form to be signed by each participant to confirm that they understand the project, they agree to participate and that all information provided will be kept confidential.

On the back of this page was a short form to gather background information about each participant, including gender, age, preferred reading and writing language, as well as number of years the participant has been speaking SASL.

The second page contained the questionnaire to be completed by the participant to evaluate the sign language video clip.

Question 1 What was said in this video?

As in both pilot user studies, this question served two purposes. The first was to encourage the participant to pay attention to what is being said in the video, and concentrate on understanding what is said in the video, and secondly to get an idea of how close to the original phrase the participant understood the message.

No numeric value was assigned to the answer.

Question 2 I am sure of my answer to Question 1?

Possible answer strongly neither agree disagree disagree nor disagree agree strongly agree This question functions in conjunction with question 1, and provides an opportunity to check the participants answers. If the participant correctly wrote down the signed phrase in question 1, the answer to this question should show the participant sure of his answer.

Remaining questions The remainder of the questionnaire consisted of seventeen five-level Likert items all using the typical Likert scale, as was used in question 2.

neither agree nor strongly disagree disagree disagree agree strongly agree These questions were grouped into sets, the statements in each set testing the same feature of the video, but one in a confirmative and the other in a negative phrasing. The order of the questions was randomised to limit the answers of one question influencing the other question in the pair.

Sign Language uses two main parts of the body for communications, the face as well as the hands of the speaker. The first four groups of questions focuses on these two areas and attempt to evaluate the impact lowering the frame rate and resolution has on the comprehension of these areas separately.

Hands

14. I could clearly see the hands.

18. It was difficult to see the hands.

Hand Gestures

3. It was difficult to follow the hand gestures in this video.

8. I could clearly see all the hand gestures in this video.

Face

10. I had difficulty seeing the details of the face.

12. I could clearly see the details of the face.

Facial Expressions

5. I had no problems seeing the facial expressions in this video.

9. It was difficult to follow the facial expressions in this video.

The movement and video speed is focussed on the movement of the hands and arms being blurred, something that is expected to happen at lower frame rates. It evaluates the general feel of the video clip, separate from the specifics of the face and the hands.

Movement

4. The movement was blurry.

7. The movement was clear.

Video speed

6. The video was the right speed.

15. The video was too slow.

19. The video was too fast.

The last two groups of the questionnaire focuses purely on the intelligibility of the video clip, and not on the quality of the video clip. Because of the different dialects in SASL, a sign used in the video clip might be a known sign to one participant, while completely senseless or out of context to another participant speaking a different dialect of SASL.

Signs

16. I knew all the signs used in this video.

17. Some signs used in this video were unknown to me.

Understanding

11. I had difficulty to understand what was said in this video.

13. It was easy to understand what was said in this video.

5.3 Observations The experiment ran smoothly, with only a few misunderstandings and recurring questions.

The Sign Language interpreter’s assistance was needed a few times answering the first question of the questionnaire to help the participants with spelling or finding the written word for a specific sign. This occurred more often than was the case in the two preceding pilot studies because of the wider range of literacy of the participants, compared to the initial groups consisting of all DCCT staff members.

Two questions needed regular explanation. The first being the general information question:

Number of years using South African Sign Language. This question was most problematic to the participants that grew up using Sign Language, and could also have been stated more clearly by asking since what year the participant has been using Sign Language. Question four of the questionnaire was the second recurring problem question, requiring the term “blurry” to be explained often.

Despite looking at the phrases used in the video clips to minimise the chances of using a phrase that might have more than one sign, depending on Sign Language dialect, the phrase “short” as used “He is a short man” was pointed out as an unknown sign by a number of participants, with most of the participants knowing the sign.

–  –  –

Table 5-2 contains the mean participant rating for each video clip, as well as the ANOVA significance value for each of the eighteen questions as well as for the average participant rating over all the questions. As can be seen in the table all of the questions returned a significance level of greater than 0.05 (p 0.05) and, therefore, there is no statistically significant difference in the mean participant rating for each of the video clips. No combination of frame rate and video resolution, either high or low, was preferred significantly more or less than any other combination of frame rate and resolution.

Figure 5-2 to Figure 5-19 show the average participant rating for the each of the questions answered by the participants in the questionnaire, with Figure 5-20 showing the overall average participant rating across all questions.

Figure 5-2: The qualitative results for Question 14 Figure 5-3: The qualitative results for Question 18 “I could clearly see the hands.” for each of the three “It was difficult to see the hands.” for each of the three frame rates and two resolutions. With a significance level frame rates and two resolutions. With a significance level of 0.896 (p =.896) there was no statistically significant of 0.644 (p =.644) there was no statistically significant difference in the average participant rating for each of the difference in the average participant rating for each of the video clips. video clips.

Figure 5-4: The qualitative results for Question 3 Figure 5-5: The qualitative results for Question 8 “It was difficult to follow the hand gestures in this video.” “I could clearly see all the hand gestures in this video.” for each of the three frame rates and two resolutions. With for each of the three frame rates and two resolutions. With a significance level of 0.527 (p =.527) there was no a significance level of 0.228 (p =.228) there was no statistically significant difference in the average statistically significant difference in the average participant rating for each of the video clips. participant rating for each of the video clips.

Figure 5-6: The qualitative results for Question 10 Figure 5-7: The qualitative results for Question 12 “I had difficulty seeing the details of the face.” for each of “I could clearly see the details of the face.” for each of the the three frame rates and two resolutions. With a three frame rates and two resolutions. With a significance significance level of 0.945 (p =.945) there was no level of 0.743 (p =.743) there was no statistically statistically significant difference in the average significant difference in the average participant rating for participant rating for each of the video clips. each of the video clips.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 6 | 7 || 9 | 10 |


Similar works:

«Memory-Centric Data Management A Monash Information Services White Paper by Curt A. Monash, Ph.D. May, 2006 Version 1.01 Sponsored by: © Monash Information Services, 2006. All rights reserved. Please do not quote in whole or in part without explicit permission. Monash Information Services may be reached via www.monash.com or 978-266-1815 or via email to curtmonash@monash.com. Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 Introduction...3 The Memory-Centric Difference...6 Memory-Centric Analytic...»

«AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE BELIEF THAT ALL WOMEN WORKING IN ROADSIDE COFFEE/JUICE KIOSKS, IN CYPRUS, ARE PROSTITUTING OR PROVIDING SEXUAL SERVICES. NICOLA DAWN SMITH & STANNA WIECLAWSKA KYRAIKOU Copyright © 2016, Nicola Dawn Smith & Stanna Wieclawska Kyriakou An Investigation into the belief that all women An investigation working in roadside coffee/juice kiosks, in into the belief that all women Cyprus, are prostituting or providing sexual working in coffee/ services. juice kiosks at the side...»

«Naked Tropics New World in the Atlantic World Jack P. Greene and Amy Turner Bushnell, Series Editors Tropical Versailles: Empire, Monarchy, and the Portuguese Royal Court In Rio de Janeiro, 1808–1821 By Kirsten Schultz Creole Gentlemen: The Maryland Elite, 1691–1776 By Trevor Burnard Within Her Power: Propertied Women in Colonial Virginia By Linda L. Sturtz Naked Tropics: Essays on Empire and Other Rogues By Kenneth Maxwell Naked Tropics Essays on Empire and Other Rogues Kenneth Maxwell...»

«Private Pensions: The Real Return A Research Report by EuroFinUse The European Federation of Financial Services Users The Real Return of Private Pensions A Research Report by EuroFinUse Authors: Jean Berthon Charles Cronin Guillaume Prache Klaus Struwe Juan Manuel Viver Contents Executive Summary Introduction Country Profiles and Real Returns Limitations Return Attribution Inflation Asset Mix Asset Performance 2000 to 2011 Equity Markets Bond Markets Portfolio Manager/Advisor Competence...»

«Bilingual Lexical Representation and Processing: Evidence from Masked Priming Studies Item type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Wang, Xin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Downloaded...»

«Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Reinert Strukturmechanik und Simulation Fachbereich Maschinenbau FEMAnalyse mit Patran/ Nastran am Beispiel einer abgesetzten Welle F Tobias Schreck Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Reinert Strukturmechanik und Simulation Fachbereich Maschinenbau Einleitung Dieses Manual soll die Einarbeitung in die FEMProgrammpakete „Patran“ (Version 2003 r2 und Version 2004 r2) und „Nastran“ (Version 2004) der Firma MSCSoftware erleichtern. Dabei baut es auf den Manualen mit den Beispielen...»

«DI-304/DI-304M ISDN Router User’s Guide First Edition (January 2002) DI304MA.A1 Printed in Taiwan RECYCLABLE Copyright Statement Copyright ©2002 D-Link Corporation No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means or used to make any derivative such as translation, transformation, or adaptation without permission from D-Link Corporation/D-Link Systems Inc., as stipulated by the United States Copyright Act of 1976. Trademarks D-Link is a registered trademark of D-Link...»

«1 Do your investments destroy or care for the planet? Robert Howell As an individual, a member of a pension fund, or as a member of an organisation that has investments, do your investments destroy or care for the Earth? Is the present financial system so corrupted that there can be no moral investments? What are the ethical and strategic criteria that you or your organisation should use to select investments? What is wrong with the large majority of socially responsible investments‟? What...»

«Weeds of the Southern United States What is a weed? Our world is green with many kinds of plants. All plants are in some way useful and beneficial. But some plants are undesirable in situations created by man to serve his particular needs. These plants are called weeds, and are most simply defined as plants out of place. This definition may be expanded to include any plant that: ■ presents difficulty in cultivating desirable plants ■ has a potential for decreasing the value of plant and...»

«Sermon #1811 Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit 1 THE ROAD TO HONOR NO. 1811 A SERMON DELIVERED ON LORD’S-DAY EVENING, OCTOBER 12, 1884, BY C. H. SPURGEON, AT THE METROPOLITAN TABERNACLE, NEWINGTON. “Them that honor Me I will honor, and they that despise Me shall be lightly esteemed.” 1 Samuel 2:30. OUR chickens generally come home to roost. Our thoughts of other men become other men’s thoughts of us. According as we measure out to our fellows, so they do measure back into our bosoms, for...»

«2016 Detailed Auction Requirements and Instructions California Cap-and-Trade Program and Québec Cap-and-Trade System Joint Auction of Greenhouse Gas Allowances Updated on June 17, 2016 1 I. Background Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) requires California to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The California Scoping Plan and the subsequent Scoping Plan Update approved in 2014 lay out the steps to reduce California’s GHG emissions by 2020, and maintain and continue those...»

«PYRATES by Wayne Mitchell Dramatis Personae CALICO JACK RACKAM.Captain RICHARD CORNER.Quarter Master GEORGE FETHERSTON.Sailing Master JEAN HOWELL.Ship’s Gunner PATRICK CARTY.Bosun NOAH HARWOOD.Ship’s Boy LT. LORD CONKLIN MRS. TISDALE MAGGIE BRIDGET GRACE KATHERINE JAMES BONNY ANNE BONNY SOLDIERS Setting: “Trade Winds” tavern in the pirate stronghold of New Providence Island in the Bahamas. UC is a heavy wood bar behind which is a door that leads to the kitchen. L is a staircase, which...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.thesis.xlibx.info - Thesis, documentation, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.