«EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2012/23 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Global Governance Programme-18 MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE OF INTERDEPENDENT ...»
In addition, the imposition of carbon border adjustments would require the estimation of the direct carbon content of imports, the total embodied carbon, including input in the value chain, or the content of comparable domestic goods (Burniaux et al., 2010, p.5). In the face of this, a rough approximation of the appropriate level could be an attractive alternative, but crudely calculated adjustments work less well at correcting leakage, and they are also susceptible to political manipulation: a convenient tool for protectionism. Even carefully calculated carbon border adjustments, however, are susceptible to manipulation, either for reasons of improvement of the terms of trade or for enhancing climate mitigation.(Barrett, 2003, p.388) In this regard, carbon border adjustments are facing a variety of legal complexities for the provision of long-term climate change prevention. As an alternative to this carbon adjustments might compensate for lacking international legislation, contributing to a regulatory patchwork that should give priority to first-best legal arrangements, not second-best trade measures.
“It’s the end of the world as we know it,” or Polycentric Risk Regulation R.E.M., the American rock band, named one of their songs: It’s the end of the world as we know it (and I feel fine). Reconsidering the regulatory framework for the mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions, one has to admit – without feeling fine – that both the increase of greenhouse gas emissions and the global rise in temperature are in fact questioning common narratives of the state, the market, Moritz Hartmann and the regulation of societal risks. Therefore, transboundary architectures to provide effective regulatory conditions for the reduction of CO2 emissions are challenged by asymmetric market conditions, heterogeneous administrative capacities, and a multitude of national policy preferences on how to regulate the risk of global climate change. Rather than waiting for a holistic global effort in a world of 200 nation states (in which legal fragmentation describes the regular evolution of laws), polycentric approaches are perceived as referring to promising policy constellations. These seem to offer the benefits of microcultural, microeconomic and microregulatory insights at multiple scales. In addition, polycentric cooperation enhances experimental governance and encourages learning from a variety of different policy set-ups, allowing for the assessment of methods, benefits, and costs of particular strategies adopted in different ecosystems (Ostrom, 2009, p.31; Homeyer, 2010, pp.121– 150; Sabel and Zeitlin, 2008, pp.271–327; Hutter, 2010, pp.3–23). In that sense, the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) initiative has been recognized as an instrumental tool for the initiation of local mitigation and adaptation actions in both developed and developing countries, and for providing key input in global climate advocacy efforts of cities and local governments (ICLEI, 1995). The regionalization of climate change policies could therefore provide the regulatory arena in which the pillars of supranational legislation and polycentric risk governance are emerging.
Despite this, polycentric regulation must be complemented by the classical collective action theory, which predicts that individuals will not change their behaviour and reduce extensive resource usage unless external authorities impose enforceable rules, which change the incentives faced by those involved (Hutter, 2010, p.5).
Therefore, rather than changing institutions at global levels, a forum for the development of a transnational rule of law may provide coherence between private and public, national and international, levels of governance for the benefit of citizens (Petersmann, 2012b).
As global governance can be understood as the globalization of local governance, what may be termed its genetic code inherently requires leadership, legitimacy and efficiency. Therefore, only a ‘four-stage sequence’ (Rawls) of constitutional, legislative, administrative and judicial arrangements of rules, principles, and institutions can allow for polycentric policy mechanisms counteracting “the end of the world as we know it” on a global scale (on the ‘four-stage sequence’, see Rawls, 1971, p.195; see for the three elements of governance, Lamy, 2012).
Global Public Goods and Asymmetric Markets: Carbon Emissions Trading and Border Carbon Adjustments References Aguilar, S. (2007) Elements for a Robust Climate Regime Post-2012: Options for Mitigation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 16 (3), 356–367.
Ahner, N. (2009) Final Instance: World Trade Organization - Unilateral Trade Measures in EU Climate Change Legislation. EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2009/58.
Van Asselt, H. et al. (2008) Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law. Law & Policy. 30 (4), 423–449.
Van Asselt, H. & Biermann, F. (2007) European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures. Energy Policy. 35 (1), 497–506.
AWG-KP (2011) Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol at its sixteenth session Draft decision [-/CMP.17].
Babiker, M. H. et al. (2002) Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial? 93.
Baettig, M. & Bernauer, T. (2009) National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? International Organization. 63283.
Barrett, S. (1999) 'International Cooperation and the Global Environment', in Inge Kaul et al. (eds.) Global public goods: international cooperation in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
Barrett, S. (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press.
Baylis, J. et al. (2010) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations.
5th edition. Oxford University Press.
Biermann, F. (2010) Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2 (4), 284–288.
Biermann, F. et al. (2010) Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge University Press.
Biermann, F. & Brohm, R. (2004) Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the USA: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border. Climate Policy. 4 (3), 289–302.
Birnie, P. W. et al. (2009) International law and the environment. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bogojević, S. (2009) Ending the Honeymoon: Deconstructing Emissions Trading Discourses. Journal of Environmental Law. 21 (3), 443–468.
Burniaux, J.-M. et al. (2010) Is there a Case for Carbon-Based Border Tax Adjustment? Paris: OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 2010/794.
CFI (2009) Poland/Commission. Reports of Cases 2009 II-03395.
Chayes, A. & Chayes, A. H. (1998) The New Sovereignty: Compliance With International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press.
Coase, R. H. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 31–44.
Council Decision 2002/358/EC of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder, OJ 2002, L130/1.
Council Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, OJ 2003, L275/32.
Council Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community, OJ 2009, L 140/63.
Czybulka, D. (2008) Klimaschutz außerhalb des Emissionshandelssystems: Ausgewählte Aktionsfelder und Rechtliche Umsetzung in Europa und in Deutschland. Europäische Zeitschrift für Umwelt- und Planungsrecht. 109.
De Cendra, J. (2006) Can Emissions Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law1. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. 15 (2), 131–145.
Demsetz, H. (1967) Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review. 57 (2), 347– 359.
Egenhofer, C. (2007) The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme::: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business. European Management Journal. 25 (6), 453–463.
Ellerman, A. D. & Buchner, B. K. (2008) Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005–06 Emissions data. Environmental and Resource Economics. 41 (2), 267–287.
EPA (2003) EPA Denies Petition to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Vehicles. Press
Release [online]. Available from:
EPA (2009a) CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion – Million metric Tons 203 (MMTco2).
[online]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/documents/pdf/CO2FFC_2007.pdf.
EPA (2009b) Greenhouse Gases Threaten Public Health and the Environment. Press Release [online].
Esty, D. C. (1992) GATTing the Greens-Not Just Greening the GATT. Foreign Affairs. 72 (5), 32.
EU ETS (2008) Emissions trading: 2007 verified emissions from EU ETS businesses IP/08/787. Press
Release [online]. Available from:
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/787&format=HTML&aged=1&lan guage=EN&guiLanguage=en (Accessed 11 May 2012). [online].
European Commission (1990) Report of the Working Group of Experts from the EC Member States on the Use of Economic and Fiscal Instruments in EC Environmental Law. Available from the Commission.
European Commission (2000) Green Paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
FCCC (2009) Copenhagen Accord Decision 2/CP.15. [online]. Available from:
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf#page=4 (Accessed 1 May 2012).
Global Public Goods and Asymmetric Markets: Carbon Emissions Trading and Border Carbon Adjustments Funk, W. (2009) Constitutional Implications of Regional CO2 Cap-and-Trade Programs: The Northeast Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative as a Case in Point. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy. 27 (1),.
GATT (1947) The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science. 1621243–1248.
Hartmann, M. (2011) Zuteilung, Auktionierung und Transfer von Emissionszertifikaten:
Entwicklungsperspektiven des EU-Emissionshandels in Phase III (2013-2020). Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht. 5246–252.
Herman, L. L. (2009) Energy trade, carbon emissions and the WTO. The Journal of World Energy Law and Business. 2 (3), 196–218.
Heyvaert, V. (2010) Europe in a Climate of Risk: Three Paradigms at Play. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper 2010/6. London: London School of Economics.
Homeyer, I. von (2010) 'Emerging Experimentalism in EU Environmental Governance', in Charles F.
Sabel & Jonathan Zeitlin (eds.) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford University Press.
Houlihan, M. B. et al. (2010) 2009: A Year Of Signiﬁcant Clean Air Act Developments On All Fronts.
Environmental Law Reporter – News & Analysis. 10250.
Hutter, B. M. (2010) 'Anticipating risk and organising risk regulation: current dilemmas', in Bridget M. Hutter (ed.) Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howse, Robert & Eliason, Antonia L. (2009) 'Domestic and international strategies to address climate change: an overview of the WTO legal issues,', in Thomas Cottier et al. (eds.) International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change: World Trade Forum. Cambridge University Press.
ICLEI (1995) ICLEI International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives - Local Governments for Sustainability [online]. Available from: http://www.iclei.org/ (Accessed 11 May 2012).
IEA (2011) Prospect of limiting the global increase in temperature to 2oC is getting bleaker. Press Release [online]. Available from: http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1959.
IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ismer, R. & Neuhoff, K. (2007) Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading. European Journal of Law and Economics. 24 (2), 137–164.
Kaul, I. et al. (2003) 'Why do Global Public Goods Matter Today', in Inge Kaul et al. (eds.) Providing
Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford University Press. [online]. Available from:
http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/oxpobooks/9780195157413.htm (Accessed 14 March 2012).
Kingsbury, B. (2007) 'Global Environmental Governance as Administration: Implications for International Law', in Daniel Bodansky & Jutta Brunnée (eds.) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
Krämer, L. (2007) 'Regional Economic Integration Organizations: The European Union as an Example', in Daniel Bodansky & Jutta Brunnée (eds.) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
Kyoto Protocol (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change. U.N. Doc FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1, 37 I.L.M. 22 [online]. Available from: