«EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2012/23 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Global Governance Programme-18 MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE OF INTERDEPENDENT ...»
Where does all of this leave the status of biodiversity as a global public good? Despite the discomfort with the commodification of nature, there are no inherent conflicts in provisioning a public good also through private actors and market-based incentives. If new participants to the endeavour of managing a common matter have changed, so may some of the manners of doing so. The advantage of a renewed energy for action is not to be undervalued either. The experience in the field of human rights gives sufficient hope for harnessing the private sector's role in implementing “laws of humanity”. However, it should be remembered that the approach of ‘global public goods’ is just one among many approaches, with a particular – not uncontested – focus on effectiveness. Many other considerations may get obscured with this particular methodological choice.
As the developments described are only recent, most of the ‘incentives’ are really only initiatives.
Yet, the ambitions and directions in which some of them are developing indicate the terrain on which biodiversity policies will be built in the future. If expanded upon in the future, challenges, not solely legal ones, are to be faced with more commitments of private actors. One common tendency of the private sector is to be selective with regard to the obligations it assumes (Affolder, 2010). Other pathologies of the private sectors' involvement are a misleading representation of the efforts while maintaining dubious practices.34 An essential task for the future is therefore to design, and put in place, safeguards to be included into eventual market mechanisms; and ensure appropriate quality standards for the private sector involvement. Regardless of the theoretical approach of scholars, it is clear that by becoming involved in the management of a common concern, the private sector has assumed the ethical obligations that public law attaches to it, and the expectation to conform to these is legitimate. If left unattended the private sector’s step into the public sphere may recast the objectives of biodiversity protection in such a way as to fit its goals, without providing a broader public benefit.
Thus, the discussion on the increased presence of the private sector in no way precludes the ongoing call to scale up the public management of biodiversity, implying the need for increased public financing, stronger public commitments, and better supervision of the private action. This contribution has in no way affected, indeed only reinforced, the acknowledgment of biodiversity as a public good being primarily in the public domain.
These practices have popularity been known as ‘greenwash’, or ‘bluewash’ in the case of corporations partnering with the UN and claiming adherence to its principles.
International incentive mechanisms for conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services References 2010 Biodiversity Challenge Conference (2009), 2 December 2009, Jakarta.
Adam, R. (2010) Missing the 2010 Biodiversity Target: A Wake-up Call for the Convention on Biodiversity? Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy. 21123–557.
Affolder, N. (2006) Cachet Not Cash: Another Sort of World Bank Group Borrowing. Michigan State Journal of International Law. 14141.
Affolder, N. (2010) The Market for Treaties. Chicago Journal of International Law. 11 (1), 159–196.
Agreement between the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Rio Tinto London
Limited (Rio Tinto) (2010) [online]. Available from:
http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/business/bbp_our_work/rio_tinto/?5674/IUCNsCollaboration-Agreement-with-Rio-Tinto (Accessed 11 May 2012).
Ashford, N. A. & Caldart, C. C. (2008) Environmental Law, Policy, and Economics: Reclaiming the Environmental Agenda. MIT Press.
Barrett, S. (1997) 'On biodiversity conservation', in Charles Perrings & Karl-Göran Mäler (eds.) Biodiversity loss: economic and ecological issues. Cambridge University Press.
Bayon, R. (2008) 'Banking on Biodiversity', in State of the World 2008: Innovations for a Sustainable Economy. Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. W.W. Norton.
[online]. Available from:
Beyerlin, U. et al. (eds.) (2006) Financial and Other Incentives for Complying with MEA Obligations.
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Bilderbeek, S. (ed.) (1992) Biodiversity and International Law: The Effectiveness of International Environmental Law. IOS Press.
Birnie, P. W. & Boyle, A. E. (2001) International law and the environment. Oxford University Press.
Bled, A. J. (2009) Business to the rescue: private sector actors and global environmental regimes’ legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 9 (2), 153– 171.
Blessing, K. (2010) Unclean Development Mechanism: Research notes on resource imperialism in the
southern Tanzanian highlands. Pambazuka News. 10 August. [online]. Available from:
Bobbitt, P. (2008) Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-First Century. A.A. Knopf.
Bonn Convention or Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, (1979).
Bothe, M. (2007) 'The Kyoto Protocol as a pioneer among the multilateral agreements', in Wybe Th Douma et al. (eds.) The Kyoto Protocol and beyond: legal and policy challenges of climate change.
TMC Asser Press.
Brahy, N. (2008) The property regime of biodiversity and traditional knowledge: institutions for conservation and innovation. Éditions Larcier.
Brink, P. ten (ed.) (2011) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Taylor & Francis.
Jerneja Penca Brunnée, Jutta (2007) 'Common Areas, Common Heritage, and Common Concern', in Daniel Bodansky et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press.
Brunnée, Jutta (2005) Enforcement Mechanisms in International Law and International Environmental Law. Environmental Law Network International Review. 31–23.
Buchanan, J. M. (1968) The demand and supply of public goods. Vol. 6. Rand McNally Chicago.
Búrca, G. D. & Scott, J. (eds.) (2006) Law and new governance in the EU and the US. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Cameron, J. et al. (1996) Improving Compliance With International Environmental Law. Earthscan.
CBD (1992) Earth Summit: Convention on Biological Diversity: final text, concluded on 5 June 1992, entered into force 29 December 1993. U.N. Doc. DPI/1307, 31 ILM 818.
CBD (2008) Positive Incentive Measures. [online]. Available from:
CBD Incentive Tool Website (2012) [online]. Available from:
CBD Secretariat (2005) 'Business and the 2010 Biodiversity Challenge: Exploring Private Sector Engagement in the Convention on Biological Diversity', in 2005 London: 20-21 January 2005.
CBD Secretariat (2011) Incentive measures for the conservation and sustainable use of biological
diversity: Case studies and lessons learned. [online]. Available from:
CBD Secretariat (2004) Proposals for the Design and Implementation of Incentive Measures. [online].
Available from: http://www.cbd.int/incentives/tools.shtml.
Chivian, E. & Bernstein, A. (2008) Sustaining life: how human health depends on biodiversity. Oxford University Press.
Climate, Community and Biodiversity Project Design Standards, (2005) [online]. Available from:
Climate, Community and Biodiversity Projects, (2005) [online]. Available from: http://www.climatestandards.org/projects/index.html.
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, (1974) [online]. Available from:
Cortell, A. P. & Davis Jr, J. W. (1996) How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly. 40 (4), 451–478.
Costanza, R. et al. (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387 (6630), 253–260.
Coughlin Jr, M. D. (1993) Using the Merck-INBio agreement to clarify the Convention on Biological Diversity. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 31 (2), 337–375.
Council Regulation (EC) 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC, OJ 2009, L 342/1.
Cullet, P. (1999) Equity and flexibility mechanisms in the climate change regime: conceptual and practical issues. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law. 8 (2), 168– 179.
International incentive mechanisms for conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services Daily, G. C. (ed.) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Vol. 1. Island Press.
Daily, G. C. & Ellison, K. (2002) The New Economy of Nature: The Quest To Make Conservation Profitable. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.
Demsetz, H. (1970) Private Production of Public Goods, The. Journal of Law and Economics. 13293– 306.
Doremus, H. (1991) Patching the ark: improving legal protection of biological diversity. Ecology Law Quarterly. 18265.
Driesen, D. (2006) 'Economic Instruments for Sustainable Development', in Benjamin J. Richardson & Stepan Wood (eds.) Environmental law for sustainability: a reader. Hart Publishing.
Equator Principles (2006) [online]. Available from: http://www.equatorprinciples.com/resources/equator_principles.pdf.
Fisher, E. (2001) Unpacking the Toolbox: Or Why the Public/Private Divide Is Important In EC Environmental Law. Tallahassee, FL: FSU College of Law Working Paper Public Law No.
2001/35. [online]. Available from:
Fisher, E. (2006) 'Risk and Environmental Law: A Beginner’s Guide’', in Benjamin J. Richardson & Stepan Wood (eds.) Environmental law for sustainability: a reader. Hart Publishing.
Florini, A. (1996) The evolution of international norms. International Studies Quarterly. 40 (3), 363– 389.
Freeman, J. (2000) The private role in public governance. NYU Law Review. 75543–1843.
Freeman, Jody & Kolstad, C. D. (2007) Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience. Oxford University Press.
Freestone, D. & Streck, C. (2010) Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen, and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Freestone, D. & Streck, C. (2005) Legal aspects of implementing the Kyoto Protocol mechanisms:
making Kyoto work. Oxford University Press.
Friedmann, W. (1964) The changing structure of international law. Columbia University Press.
FTA dispute settlement body (1990) US – Canada Lobster Dispute.
Gaia & Grain (2000) Biodiversity for Sale: Dismantling the hype about benefit sharing. Global Trade
and Biodiversity in Conflict. 4. [online]. Available from:
Gaston, K. J. (2010) 'Biodiversity', in Navjot S. Sodhi & Paul R. Ehrlich (eds.) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press.
GATT Panel (1991) Report on The Tuna - Dolphin Case (Mexico vs. United States).
Ghilarov, A. (1996) What does ‘biodiversity’ mean—scientific problem or convenient myth? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 11 (7), 304–306.
'Global Business of Biodiversity Symposium', in 13 July 2010 London, (2010) [online]. Available from: http://www.businessofbiodiversity.co.uk/.
Global Reporting Initiative (2000) Indicator Protocols Set Environment (EN). [online]. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1-Environment-Indicator-Protocols.pdf.
Glowka, L. et al. (1996) Guide de la convention sur la diversité biologique (guide to the biodiversity convention). Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
Golub, J. (ed.) (1998) New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU. Psychology Press.
Grabosky, P. N. (1995) Using non-governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance.
Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 8 (4), 527–550.
Green Development Initiative, (2011) [online]. Available from: http://gdi.earthmind.net/.
Greenpeace International (2010) Indonesia’s Forest and Peatlands Legally protected areas, proposed
moratorium areas, and forests and peatlands at risk. [online]. Available from:
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010) Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gunningham, N. (2009) 'Introduction', in Neil Gunningham (ed.) Corporate Environmental Responsibility. Ashgate.
Gunningham, N. (2009) Environment law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law. 21 (2), 179–212.
Gunningham, N. & Grabosky, P. N. (1998) Smart regulation: designing environmental policy.
Gunningham, N. et al. (2004) Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry. 29 (2), 307–341.
Guruswamy, L. D. (1999) The Convention on Biological Diversity: exposing the flawed foundations.
Environmental conservation. 26 (2), 79–82.
Hajer, M. A. (1997) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press.
Harvey, C. A. et al. (2010) What is needed to make REDD+ work on the ground? Lessons learned from pilot forest carbon initiatives. Arlington, Virginia, USA: Conservation International.
Heijnsbergen, P. van (1997) International Legal Protection of Wild Fauna and Flora. IOS Press.